|  
|
|
Special Topics: Federalism
As I note at p. 15 of
Constitutional Law of Canada, 8th edition,
there are four branches of Canadian constitutional law: federalism,
constitutionalism, parliamentarism, and democracy. This general
categorization was later adopted, with some modifications, by
the Supreme Court of Canada in the Quebec Secession
Reference ("four foundational constitutional principles
that are most germane for resolution of this Reference: federalism,
democracy, constitutionalism and the rule of law, and respect for
minority rights"). Federalism is the cornerstone of
the Canadian state. As the Court recognized in the Secession
Reference, at para 43, "Federalism was a legal response to the
underlying political and cultural realities that existed at
Confederation and continue to exist today. At Confederation,
political leaders told their respective communities that the
Canadian union would be able to reconcile diversity with unity."
There are twenty three federations in the world containing
approximately two billion people, or forty per cent of the world's
population. Among these twenty three federations are the countries
that have the longest surviving constitutions, are the most stable
and secure, are the most at peace, exhibit the strongest democratic
tendencies, are the wealthiest and are accounted the most
advantageous places to live by all international indexes.
Political history testifies to the genius of federalism as a
highly adaptable and liberating form of political organization. The
world's most unified states-- Spain, France, Italy, the United
Kingdom -- are now moving towards federal style arrangements as a
solution to various types of political difficulties.
Notwithstanding these developments, the merits of federalism are
still hotly debated. In the materials contained in the text,
critics and proponents of federalism argue on whether federalism
is flexible, whether it accentuates or alleviates ethnic and
geographical rivalries, and whether there are institutional problems
with federalism, namely duplication and overlap. Some of these
debates are carried out in the links listed below. I encourage
students to not only think about these debates in the abstract,
but also to carry them forward into the doctrinal analyses of the
various division of powers. To what extent does the Court's
jurisprudence in, for example, trade and commerce, reflect
these debates?
In addition to materials contained in
Constitutional Law of Canada, 8th edition,
the following links might be of some interest:
General
Publications
Research Groups
|
 
|